-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
fix(trigger): skip canonical-paired members when validating required fields on deploy #4100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
waleedlatif1
wants to merge
2
commits into
staging
from
waleedlatif1/fix-trigger-canonical-validation
+29
−14
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Stale baseConfig values bypass required field validation
Medium Severity
The second-pass guard
providerConfig[subBlock.id] !== undefinedcan be satisfied by stale values inherited frombaseConfig(spread intoproviderConfigat initialization), not just values set during the first pass. IftriggerConfigcontains a leftover entry for a field the user has since cleared, the required-field check is silently skipped, allowing deployment with missing required fields. The old code always validated againstgetConfigValueresults regardless ofproviderConfigcontents. A separateSettracking first-pass fills would be more reliable than checkingproviderConfig.Additional Locations (1)
apps/sim/lib/webhooks/deploy.ts#L179-L180Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit c7ae3ef. Configure here.