You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently, the requireNodeAddon() function requires only 1 string argument, which was expected to be a relative path to the compiled Node add-on. This worked great for the first few simple PoCs and demos, but it start showing its age and limitations already. In the meantime @kraenhansen in #12 added support for hashing the module paths to solve the issues of name clashes when modules are being packaged, which was later replaced by #32.
Problem statement
The current solution does not support addons, which are imported by specifying just the package name, whose package.json specifies the main field.
Adding additional parameters to requireNodeAddon() that would enable the platform's add-on loader to resolve the path and try a few of them. My current suggestion is to have requireNodeAddon(requiredPath: string, targetPackageName: string, fromSubpath: string) where:
requiredPath is (in most cases) the original relative path passed to the require() call. If this path was not relative (starting with . or ..) then it should be the package name which will be resolved by looking up the main field, making this argument a relative subpath again.
packageName should be the name of the package that this add-on is expected to be in. Please note that such package name might be scoped, therefore - for simplicity - I've decided to keep it separated from the subpath.
fromSubpath is the relative path (subpath) of the file that issued the call to the require() function. This parameter is needed to resolve the package-relative path where the add-on is supposed to be.
Example use case 1
Somebody in ./src/index.js within package @callstack/foo wrote:
constmodule=require('./build/Release/foo.node');
Our Babel plugin should replace it with following:
In this case, the native loader would be able to resolve the relative path by combining ./build/Release/foo.node on top of ./src/index.js, resulting in ./src/build/Release/foo.node - which should be added to the search paths.
Note
If the path would include the package name (especially when it's scoped), like @callstack/foo/src/build/Release/foo.node, then separating the package name from the subpath would be a little bit more convoluted (we would need to parse it). Passing those as separate arguments gives us those "for free".
Example use-case 2
Somebody in the package @callstack/foo set the main field in their package.json to ./foo.node. A different user in their package (say whatever) writes:
Following the steps from the "algorithm" above, the relative path would be resolved to ./foo.node (it used the path from main and ./package.json gives ./), which will be expected to be in the @callstack/foo package. The exact value of the last argument is not that important here (can be ./ or . as well).
Example use-case 3
Somebody in ./src/wrapper.js that's part of package foo wrote:
constfs=require('node:fs');
Our Babel plugin is expected to output this instead:
One of the main goals of this proposal would be to "hide" the resolution algorithm in native code. The JavaScript side should not care whether the names are hashed or changed in any other way. The closer the original Node.js code, the better. Those 3 separate arguments: requiredPath, targetPackageName and fromSubpath gives more flexibility to the native loader. If all the addons are flattened into a single directory (like for iOS), the JS does not care -- the native loader will be able to implement this logic and try different search paths and variants.
Lastly, it shouldn't be hard to adapt this approach to support ES modules that use import and export.
Context
Currently, the
requireNodeAddon()function requires only 1 string argument, which was expected to be a relative path to the compiled Node add-on. This worked great for the first few simple PoCs and demos, but it start showing its age and limitations already. In the meantime @kraenhansen in #12 added support for hashing the module paths to solve the issues of name clashes when modules are being packaged, which was later replaced by #32.Problem statement
package.jsonspecifies themainfield.Proposed solution
Adding additional parameters to
requireNodeAddon()that would enable the platform's add-on loader to resolve the path and try a few of them. My current suggestion is to haverequireNodeAddon(requiredPath: string, targetPackageName: string, fromSubpath: string)where:requiredPathis (in most cases) the original relative path passed to therequire()call. If this path was not relative (starting with.or..) then it should be the package name which will be resolved by looking up themainfield, making this argument a relative subpath again.packageNameshould be the name of the package that this add-on is expected to be in. Please note that such package name might be scoped, therefore - for simplicity - I've decided to keep it separated from the subpath.fromSubpathis the relative path (subpath) of the file that issued the call to therequire()function. This parameter is needed to resolve the package-relative path where the add-on is supposed to be.Example use case 1
Somebody in
./src/index.jswithin package@callstack/foowrote:Our Babel plugin should replace it with following:
In this case, the native loader would be able to resolve the relative path by combining
./build/Release/foo.nodeon top of./src/index.js, resulting in./src/build/Release/foo.node- which should be added to the search paths.Note
If the path would include the package name (especially when it's scoped), like
@callstack/foo/src/build/Release/foo.node, then separating the package name from the subpath would be a little bit more convoluted (we would need to parse it). Passing those as separate arguments gives us those "for free".Example use-case 2
Somebody in the package
@callstack/fooset themainfield in theirpackage.jsonto./foo.node. A different user in their package (saywhatever) writes:then our Babel plugin should output:
Following the steps from the "algorithm" above, the relative path would be resolved to
./foo.node(it used the path frommainand./package.jsongives./), which will be expected to be in the@callstack/foopackage. The exact value of the last argument is not that important here (can be./or.as well).Example use-case 3
Somebody in
./src/wrapper.jsthat's part of packagefoowrote:Our Babel plugin is expected to output this instead:
More flexible loader
One of the main goals of this proposal would be to "hide" the resolution algorithm in native code. The JavaScript side should not care whether the names are hashed or changed in any other way. The closer the original Node.js code, the better. Those 3 separate arguments:
requiredPath,targetPackageNameandfromSubpathgives more flexibility to the native loader. If all the addons are flattened into a single directory (like for iOS), the JS does not care -- the native loader will be able to implement this logic and try different search paths and variants.Lastly, it shouldn't be hard to adapt this approach to support ES modules that use
importandexport.